Loading... Please wait...

Products

Independently Tested for Your Health


INDEPENDENTLY TESTED BY CENTRE FOR ALLIED HEALTH EVIDENCE
University of South Australia
Project Directors: Associated Professors Karen Grimmer & Mr. Steve Milanese



Aims

This study provides evidence regarding the usefulness of the Drag Bag in protecting spinal health.   The research questions were:

  • How much difference is there between the spinal posture of the completely unloaded body, and carrying the Drag Bag?
  • How does the Drag Bag compare ergonomically with other backpacks, using the same weights?
  • What is the general perception of users of the Drag Bag with respect to useability, time spent carrying compared with dragging etc ?
  • How does the Drag Bag compare ergonomically with other trolley bags on the market, using the same weights?
Method

Testing comprised three phases: laboratory assessment, ergonomic assessment and a field study.   

  • The laboratory assessment tested the effect of carrying the Drag Bag on spinal posture. The laboratory sample consisted of 21 consenting individuals (age range 9 years to 53 years).    Weights of 5%, 10% and 15% of body weight were carried in the Drag Bag, and in the PhysioPak V2 (the comparison bag).    Previous testing has identified the percentage difference in measures of net spinal posture (from unloaded) when using PhysioPak and off-the-shelf school backpacks with these same weights. PhysioPak V2 was identified as being the best available backpack (at the time) in minimising net postural deviation from ‘unloaded’.

Side-view photographs were taken of body posture, using usual marker positions.    From the x,y coordinates digitised from these pictures, postural change in the horizontal direction was measured between different carrying conditions and backpacks, and within-subject comparisons made.       

  • A comparison of the effects on posture was made of 5%, 10% and 15% body weight carried in main space in the bag.   The effect of 5% of body weight was also tested in the computer pocket of both backpacks (which is situated in the anterior aspect of the PhysioPak V 2 and in the posterior aspect of the Drag Bag).   Two ‘unloaded’ photographs (without any backpack) were also taken for comparison.
  • Subjects were questioned at the end of the laboratory session to assess the levels of comfort and ease of use of the bag in relation to the PhyioPak V2 and elicit opinions on the Drag Bag.  
  • A small number of volunteers from the laboratory study sample trialed the Drag Bag for one week each in their usual study / work environments.    They reported in free text at the end of the week on predetermined topics: the useability of the bag in their own environment, including the things that they liked and didn’t like about the bag’s design and features, the nature and weight of loads they carried   in the bag, and how they preferred to use it (on the back or pulling along).   They were asked to compare their experiences of the Drag Bag with those of using their usual method of load transportation.  
Results from Laboratory Study

21 subjects participated in the laboratory study:

  • 11 young people (8 boys, 3 girls, aged between 9 and 18 years)
  • 10 adults (5 males, 5 females, aged between 19 and 53 years)
Under backpack carrying conditions, compared with ‘unloaded’

There were consistent findings for all but one of the children, and for six of the adults, in the way they responded to the Drag Bag, compared with ‘unloaded’ posture.   

There was a linear response of increasing net postural deviation from ‘unloaded’ for loads of the empty bag, 5% and 10% of body weight. However, the Drag Bag seems to perform better with higher loads in it, as it produces the same amount of postural deviation at higher loads as it does at lower loads. There seems to be a threshold effect at about 10% body weight, where the true value of the bag becomes obvious under its backpack carrying performance. Carrying a weight in the computer pocket seems also to be more posturally efficient than carrying the same weight in the body of the backpack .  

This finding is of particular interest, when considering the variability in ‘unloaded’ posture in the children in the study. Thus it seems that wearing Drag Bag on the back corrects posture of young people.

Under backpack carrying conditions, compared with PhysioPak V2
For children, there were real similarities, with no statistically significant differences, in the way that Drag Bag performed at the same weights, compared with PhysioPak V2. As PhysioPak V2 is the best backpack we have tested to date, in terms of minimising postural deviations when carrying loads, this means that Drag Bag can claim similar good performance.
Feedback after laboratory study

All but one participant liked the Drag Bag design, including the fabric, strap width and positioning, compartment design and features (such as lunchbox, rain cover etc).  

Preliminary testing of trolley bag version of the Drag Bag around the laboratory and the immediate university environment (up and down stairs, in and out of lifts, on carpet, tiles, gravel, concrete) brought favourable reactions from everyone, with the friction-free wheel design bringing most approval .

All subjects commented on the comfort of the Drag Bag when worn as a backpack, saying that the strap width suited their body shape, the backpack sat comfortably on their backs (and in some instances subjects noted that they seemed to stand better with the backpack on). They didn’t notice any increase in discomfort when increasing weights were placed into the backpack during testing.

Recommendations from Laboratory Study

Drag Bag performs well under laboratory conditions for most body types, and for both genders over a range of ages.   When it is unloaded, it significantly changes ‘unloaded’ posture, but then so have every bag that we have tested. It seems to perform better under heavier weights, when carried in the body of the backpack, and in the computer pocket.   It seems that carrying Drag   Bag on the back, as in a conventional backpack arrangement, does not put the spine under abnormal horizontal perturbations, and thus it can be deemed to be posturally safe for adult and child wearers.  

The Drag Bag offers a well designed piece of equipment which works well as a backpack and as a trolley bag under usual conditions.   It seems to handle heavier weights well in its backpack version, and its ease of locomotion as a trolley bag suggests that this is also an efficient way of transporting heavy loads .

Field Trial

Drag Bag was tested for one week under usual load carrying and transport conditions by six subjects (three children and three adults) (representing 6 weeks total of testing).   The good things about the bag were commonly identified as being:

  • Its versatility (being able to be carried on the back when appropriate, and dragged along the ground when appropriate)
  • Its comfort when being carried
  • Its smart looks and features, including the lunchbox features and rain cover
  • Its wheel and handle design, which allowed for easy locomotion along streets, over gutters, up and down stairs etc
  • Its fabric and the sturdy zips
  • Its different compartments, making it easy to keep track of items

All subjects liked the trolley-bag feature of the Drag Bag – the trolley handle seemed to be at an appropriate height for all subjects (irrespective of their physical size), the wheels travelled over all required terrain, it was very energy efficient to drag heavy loads and easy to manoeuvre the trolley bag in all situations.

 



Drag Bag Newsletter